IDEAS home Printed from
MyIDEAS: Login to save this article or follow this journal

Industry-specific effects of antidumping activities: evidence from the US, the European Union and China

  • Moonsung Kang
  • Hongshik Lee
  • Soonchan Park
Registered author(s):

    This article analyses industry-specific effects of Antidumping (AD) activities on trade, using the system Generalized Method of Moments (GMM) in dynamic panel date models. In the process of doing so, this article selected three frequent AD users, such as the US, the European Union (EU) and China. Additionally, we chose the metal/steel, chemical and plastic/rubber industries for the US cases; chemical, metal/steel and machinery/electronics industries for the EU cases; and the chemical industry for the Chinese cases. Based on the analyses conducted herein, we detected positive evidence of industry-specific impacts of AD measures imposed by the three frequent users.

    If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.

    File URL:
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to look for a different version under "Related research" (further below) or search for a different version of it.

    Article provided by Taylor & Francis Journals in its journal Applied Economics.

    Volume (Year): 44 (2012)
    Issue (Month): 8 (March)
    Pages: 999-1008

    in new window

    Handle: RePEc:taf:applec:44:y:2012:i:8:p:999-1008
    Contact details of provider: Web page:

    Order Information: Web:

    No references listed on IDEAS
    You can help add them by filling out this form.

    This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.

    When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:applec:44:y:2012:i:8:p:999-1008. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Michael McNulty)

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.

    If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis using RePEc data.