Estimating the impact of good news on stock market volatility
The literature agrees that bad news increases volatility but disagrees over the impact of good news on stock market volatility and often report it as statistically insignificant. This article shows that accounting for endogenously determined structural breaks within the asymmetric Generalized Autoregressive Conditional Heteroscedastic (GARCH) model reduces volatility persistence and good news significantly decreases volatility. However, good news does not affect volatility if structural breaks are ignored. We validate our empirical results with Monte Carlo simulations and provide an intuitive explanation for our results. Our results resolve earlier inconsistencies in the literature and have important practical implications for building accurate asset pricing models and forecasting of stock market volatility.
If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to look for a different version under "Related research" (further below) or search for a different version of it.
Volume (Year): 21 (2011)
Issue (Month): 8 ()
|Contact details of provider:|| Web page: http://www.tandfonline.com/RAFE20|
|Order Information:||Web: http://www.tandfonline.com/pricing/journal/RAFE20|
When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:apfiec:v:21:y:2011:i:8:p:545-554. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Michael McNulty)
If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.