IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/apeclt/v7y2000i3p193-197.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Decades of daily data versus one week data with ultra-high frequency: a note on estimating expected rate of return and volatility

Author

Listed:
  • Yue Fang

Abstract

Are twodecades of daily observations more plausible thana set of hourly data of the same size? Is it true that the more data there is the better the estimate? To answer those questions, an understanding of two types of consistency associated with estimates of return andvolatility is fundamental. The first consistency depends critically upon the total length of observation period and reciprocates with estimation of return; while the second emphasizes the role of sampling frequency and is more relevant when dealing with estimation of volatility. This letter addresses certain important issues from estimating return and volatility with focuses on the nature and the distinction of these two consistencies as well as their respective empirical implications.

Suggested Citation

  • Yue Fang, 2000. "Decades of daily data versus one week data with ultra-high frequency: a note on estimating expected rate of return and volatility," Applied Economics Letters, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 7(3), pages 193-197.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:apeclt:v:7:y:2000:i:3:p:193-197
    DOI: 10.1080/135048500351780
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.informaworld.com/openurl?genre=article&doi=10.1080/135048500351780&magic=repec&7C&7C8674ECAB8BB840C6AD35DC6213A474B5
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/135048500351780?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:apeclt:v:7:y:2000:i:3:p:193-197. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/RAEL20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.