IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/apeclt/v33y2026i6p848-854.html

The effect of household cooking fuel transition on self-rated health: evidence from China

Author

Listed:
  • Lili Wu
  • Qin Liu
  • Lin Li
  • Jiajia Fang

Abstract

To reduce the health risks caused by air pollution, China is actively promoting a household clean energy transition. Using Chinese Families Panel Survey (CFPS) data, this paper employs both DID and PSM-DID models to investigate the health effect of the household cooking fuel transition. It also examines the heterogeneous impact of this transition in different population groups and the mechanisms responsible for the heterogeneity. The results indicate that the clean energy transition significantly improves residents’ health, but disadvantaged groups, such as individuals with low-income and high-energy burdens who reside in rural areas, receive fewer health benefits from the transition than others. Most members of these groups cannot easily obtain clean energy or replace non-clean energy at a lower cost. To address these issues in energy-related health inequality, the government needs to improve the affordability, accessibility, and reliability of clean energy and increase health subsidies for relatively vulnerable residents.

Suggested Citation

  • Lili Wu & Qin Liu & Lin Li & Jiajia Fang, 2026. "The effect of household cooking fuel transition on self-rated health: evidence from China," Applied Economics Letters, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 33(6), pages 848-854, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:apeclt:v:33:y:2026:i:6:p:848-854
    DOI: 10.1080/13504851.2024.2397082
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/13504851.2024.2397082
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/13504851.2024.2397082?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:apeclt:v:33:y:2026:i:6:p:848-854. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/RAEL20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.