IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/apeclt/v33y2026i3p347-352.html

Can administrative monopoly regulation enhance corporate ESG performance? Evidence from the fair competition review system

Author

Listed:
  • Xing Li
  • Jing Niu
  • Dan Yang
  • Zimin Liu
  • Gang Yang

Abstract

Taking the promulgation of the ‘Fair Competition Review System (FCRS)’ in 2016 as a quasi-natural experiment, we employed a generalized Difference-in-Differences model and the listed company data between 2009 and 2021 to investigate the impact of administrative monopoly regulation (AMR) on corporate ESG performance. We find that AMR can enhance corporate ESG performance by building a fairer competition environment, standardizing corporate competition behaviour and promoting corporate sustainable development. Additionally, AMR has a greater promoting effect on the ESG performance of non-zombie enterprises, non-state-owned enterprises, and high-tech enterprises.

Suggested Citation

  • Xing Li & Jing Niu & Dan Yang & Zimin Liu & Gang Yang, 2026. "Can administrative monopoly regulation enhance corporate ESG performance? Evidence from the fair competition review system," Applied Economics Letters, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 33(3), pages 347-352, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:taf:apeclt:v:33:y:2026:i:3:p:347-352
    DOI: 10.1080/13504851.2024.2366426
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/13504851.2024.2366426
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/13504851.2024.2366426?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:apeclt:v:33:y:2026:i:3:p:347-352. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/RAEL20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.