IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/apeclt/v32y2025i15p2250-2255.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

R&D investments and idiosyncratic volatility: evidence from a quasi-natural experiment

Author

Listed:
  • Jinpeng Lv
  • Ling Du
  • Jie Xiao

Abstract

An intriguing phenomenon in the U.S. stock market is that the level of average stock return volatility has increased considerably since the 1960s. We argue that corporate R&D investments provide an explanation for this phenomenon due to the uncertainties of R&D investment payouts and the information asymmetry between firms and investors. We employ a quasi-natural experiment, namely, the changes in state-level R&D tax credits in the U.S. to investigate the effect of R&D investments on idiosyncratic volatility. The results of baseline regressions show that a one-standard-deviation increase in R&D tax credits (user cost of R&D capital) is associated with a 0.013 (0.049) standard-deviation increase (reduction) in idiosyncratic volatility. This finding provides an explanation for the increasing trend in the average stock return volatility over the recent decades.

Suggested Citation

  • Jinpeng Lv & Ling Du & Jie Xiao, 2025. "R&D investments and idiosyncratic volatility: evidence from a quasi-natural experiment," Applied Economics Letters, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 32(15), pages 2250-2255, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:apeclt:v:32:y:2025:i:15:p:2250-2255
    DOI: 10.1080/13504851.2024.2332569
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/13504851.2024.2332569
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/13504851.2024.2332569?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:apeclt:v:32:y:2025:i:15:p:2250-2255. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/RAEL20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.