IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/apeclt/v32y2025i15p2200-2205.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Uneven infection and government capacity: evidence from Shanghai lockdown

Author

Listed:
  • Sili Cao
  • Xiaochi Shen

Abstract

In April, 2022 the government of Shanghai initiated a severe lockdown in which the city’s 25 million residents were required to remain in their apartment buildings for 2 months. During the lockdown, sub-district (‘Jiedao’) governments were responsible for implementing COVID policies and allocating basic goods to the residents within their local administrative boundaries. This paper documents a strong negative correlation between new COVID-19 infections and the distance to the sub-district boundaries. Such correlation is intensified when the government expenditures and goods accessibility are low. We argue that this pattern results from insufficient local government capacity to serve the entire sub-district; individuals near the boundary may evade regulations and seek private connections to obtain goods or services, thereby increasing their risk of being infected. Our results provide insight into government management in the pandemic context and offer new evidence that geography affects the implementation of government policy even at small local levels.

Suggested Citation

  • Sili Cao & Xiaochi Shen, 2025. "Uneven infection and government capacity: evidence from Shanghai lockdown," Applied Economics Letters, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 32(15), pages 2200-2205, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:apeclt:v:32:y:2025:i:15:p:2200-2205
    DOI: 10.1080/13504851.2024.2332560
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/13504851.2024.2332560
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/13504851.2024.2332560?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:apeclt:v:32:y:2025:i:15:p:2200-2205. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/RAEL20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.