IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/apeclt/v32y2025i13p1933-1940.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Critics’ pick or social media smash: the effect of critics’ reviews and social media on Broadway

Author

Listed:
  • Lilly Springer
  • Kathy Paulson Gjerde

Abstract

Using Broadway shows that ran between 2014–2018, this study assesses the relevance of conventional predictors of a Broadway show’s success in the digital age. Although some conventional show characteristics continue to contribute to a show’s success, other factors identified in previous studies as being key to survival appear to have little to no importance during this time period. Focusing on our key variables of interest, traditional newspaper reviews and initial Twitter follower count, both favourable reviews and a high Twitter follower count contribute to the success of a Broadway show in terms of its average weekly grosses, with initial follower count having a more pronounced effect than favourable critical reviews in a show’s opening week. Thus, while newspaper reviews still play a role in this industry, their influence in terms of filling seats and generating revenue may be waning.

Suggested Citation

  • Lilly Springer & Kathy Paulson Gjerde, 2025. "Critics’ pick or social media smash: the effect of critics’ reviews and social media on Broadway," Applied Economics Letters, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 32(13), pages 1933-1940, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:taf:apeclt:v:32:y:2025:i:13:p:1933-1940
    DOI: 10.1080/13504851.2024.2331668
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/13504851.2024.2331668
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/13504851.2024.2331668?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:apeclt:v:32:y:2025:i:13:p:1933-1940. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/RAEL20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.