IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/apeclt/v30y2023i19p2797-2802.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Experienced survey participants, biased responses? – The example of cognitive reflection

Author

Listed:
  • Sven Grüner
  • Norbert Hirschauer

Abstract

The Cognitive Reflection Test (CRT) is used in behavioural studies to describe individuals as intuitive or reflective. In recent years, behavioural scientists have increasingly recruited participants on online platforms. Besides convenience, apt platform recruitment is believed to increase validity and facilitate more meaningful inferences towards the population of interest compared to studies based on students. But particularly with regard to CRT, there is an often-underestimated drawback: ‘experienced clickers’ might systematically distort findings.

Suggested Citation

  • Sven Grüner & Norbert Hirschauer, 2023. "Experienced survey participants, biased responses? – The example of cognitive reflection," Applied Economics Letters, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 30(19), pages 2797-2802, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:apeclt:v:30:y:2023:i:19:p:2797-2802
    DOI: 10.1080/13504851.2022.2107982
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/13504851.2022.2107982
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/13504851.2022.2107982?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:apeclt:v:30:y:2023:i:19:p:2797-2802. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/RAEL20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.