IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/apeclt/v27y2020i9p729-735.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Testing the long-run PPP for Turkey: new evidence from the Fourier quantile unit root test

Author

Listed:
  • Murat Doğanlar
  • Oktay Kızılkaya
  • Faruk Mike

Abstract

This study analyses the long-run validity of the purchasing power parity (PPP) between Turkey and its major trading partners (China, Euro Area, Russia, United Kingdom, and United States) by using the Fourier quantile unit root test. Fourier quantile unit root test results show that PPP is valid for all countries. Additionally, the Fourier quantile unit root test presents more evidence in favour of the PPP hypothesis in comparison to conventional and other Fourier-type unit root tests.

Suggested Citation

  • Murat Doğanlar & Oktay Kızılkaya & Faruk Mike, 2020. "Testing the long-run PPP for Turkey: new evidence from the Fourier quantile unit root test," Applied Economics Letters, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 27(9), pages 729-735, May.
    • Handle: RePEc:taf:apeclt:v:27:y:2020:i:9:p:729-735
    DOI: 10.1080/13504851.2019.1644435
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/13504851.2019.1644435
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/13504851.2019.1644435?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Thomas L Bradley & Paul B Eberle, 2023. "Purchasing Power Parity In Russia And The Transitioning Economy 1990-1995," Review of Economic and Business Studies, Alexandru Ioan Cuza University, Faculty of Economics and Business Administration, issue 31, pages 85-111, June.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:apeclt:v:27:y:2020:i:9:p:729-735. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/RAEL20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.