IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/apeclt/v23y2016i11p804-811.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

An empirical assessment of initial return volatility in newly listed stocks

Author

Listed:
  • Paul B. McGuinness

Abstract

A stock’s first month of listing or ‘seasoning’ is often characterized by sharp volatility in initial returns. Such volatility is likely to be even more pronounced in initial public offering (IPO) markets where retail investors exert significant influence. I consider initial return volatility for IPOs pitched in Hong Kong, where the market organizer requires a sizeable fraction of shares on offer to be assigned to a retail subscription tranche. Within this context, I examine the pattern and determinants of IPO stocks’ initial return volatility levels over their first 30 days of ‘seasoning’. I observe that IPO underpricing, market sentiment and float size figure as key explanatory factors. Results also reaffirm the importance of information asymmetry effects (Ritter, 1984; Beatty and Ritter, 1986; and Lowry et al., 2010). Larger IPO firms with tighter offer price spreads and more reputable underwriters exhibit noticeably greater price stability. I also assess Ljungqvist, Nanda and Singh’s (2006) proposition that underpricing in ‘hot’ IPOs protects issuers and subscribers against a subsequent fall-off in issuer sentiment. Via analysis of retail tranche share allotments, I meaningfully extend findings (Jiang and Li, 2013) in this area.

Suggested Citation

  • Paul B. McGuinness, 2016. "An empirical assessment of initial return volatility in newly listed stocks," Applied Economics Letters, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 23(11), pages 804-811, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:apeclt:v:23:y:2016:i:11:p:804-811
    DOI: 10.1080/13504851.2015.1109035
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/13504851.2015.1109035
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/13504851.2015.1109035?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:apeclt:v:23:y:2016:i:11:p:804-811. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/RAEL20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.