IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/alresp/v23y2026i2p222-234.html

AI and the case for executive action learning

Author

Listed:
  • Ghislaine Caulat

Abstract

This account of practice examines how Action Learning, in its original Revansian form, can serve as a uniquely effective developmental approach for executives navigating the challenges posed by Artificial Intelligence (AI). Drawing on my nearly twenty-five years of experience as an Action Learning facilitator, I describe the design and facilitation of VALAI (Virtual Action Learning for AI), a programme developed by myself and delivered together with Janet Johnson, specialised in AI, for a cross-organisational set of five to six senior leaders with varying levels of AI literacy. I begin by situating the contemporary AI challenge within the context of a possible Kuhnian paradigm shift and argue that traditional pedagogical methods – whether focused on AI literacy or on generic leadership competences – are insufficient when the questions themselves remain fluid. I then present seven theoretical reasons why Action Learning is particularly well suited to the AI era, before offering a detailed account of the VALAI programme and the experiences of four participants. The account concludes that Action Learning equips leaders with the agency, critical thinking, and adaptive capacity required to lead the AI transformation rather than be overtaken by it.

Suggested Citation

  • Ghislaine Caulat, 2026. "AI and the case for executive action learning," Action Learning: Research and Practice, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 23(2), pages 222-234, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:alresp:v:23:y:2026:i:2:p:222-234
    DOI: 10.1080/14767333.2026.2679864
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/14767333.2026.2679864
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/14767333.2026.2679864?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:alresp:v:23:y:2026:i:2:p:222-234. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/CALR20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.