IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/alresp/v22y2025i3p341-347.html

Transitions in the SEND system: collective research planning through action learning (AoP 1)

Author

Listed:
  • Anne Murphy
  • Karin Tusting
  • Diane Ainsworth
  • Andy Lovatt FRSA
  • Diane Norburn

Abstract

This paper tells the story of how a small group of academics and practitioners worked together using action learning to produce a collectively planned research proposal aimed at addressing challenges in the English special educational needs and disabilities (SEND) system. A genuine attempt to try something new, the paper reflects on the pros and cons of taking an approach which tries to balance doing action learning with engaging in research planning. After describing some of the challenges the SEND system faces, the paper focuses on the topic of transitions which emerged as a common theme in the action learning set we established. The paper summarises some of the problems brought to the set by its members, the asynchronous action learning process which evolved over email, the analysis of the textual threads contained in the emails and the emerging research focus on the importance of strategic documents which aim to introduce change. The paper concludes by reflecting on what we have learned from the process focusing especially on the tensions between research and practice.

Suggested Citation

  • Anne Murphy & Karin Tusting & Diane Ainsworth & Andy Lovatt FRSA & Diane Norburn, 2025. "Transitions in the SEND system: collective research planning through action learning (AoP 1)," Action Learning: Research and Practice, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 22(3), pages 341-347, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:alresp:v:22:y:2025:i:3:p:341-347
    DOI: 10.1080/14767333.2025.2564540
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/14767333.2025.2564540
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/14767333.2025.2564540?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:alresp:v:22:y:2025:i:3:p:341-347. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/CALR20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.