IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/alresp/v19y2022i1p89-98.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

An account of practice on facilitated co-constructed action learning: a reflection of the executive education programme delivery

Author

Listed:
  • Bing Wu Berberich

Abstract

This paper introduces a facilitated co-constructed action learning approach with a narrative account of the author’s own learning on designing and delivering an executive education programme. Action learning has double inference in this context as the author developed and improved teaching design and delivery through action learning. He also revised the design of delivery of action learning to learners through critical self-reflection. The author states that university teaching faculty plays a crucial role in facilitating learners’ development and application of reflective practice. Reflective practice underlines the ability of critical thinking, which is considered the highest level of thinking [Dewey (1910). How We Think. Boston: D.C.Heath]. Consequently, the effectiveness of reflective practice unlikely happens unless individuals have achieved this level of thinking. Reflecting on the teaching experience, the author highlights two elements that potentially contribute to the effective outcomes of higher education learning and teaching: teaching faculty competence in mastering the application of action learning approaching in university learning and teaching design.

Suggested Citation

  • Bing Wu Berberich, 2022. "An account of practice on facilitated co-constructed action learning: a reflection of the executive education programme delivery," Action Learning: Research and Practice, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 19(1), pages 89-98, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:alresp:v:19:y:2022:i:1:p:89-98
    DOI: 10.1080/14767333.2022.2033030
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/14767333.2022.2033030
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/14767333.2022.2033030?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:alresp:v:19:y:2022:i:1:p:89-98. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/CALR20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.