IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/alresp/v15y2018i3p210-223.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Yes we can: towards assurance of learning by scholarly academics through a praxeology of the scholarship of teaching

Author

Listed:
  • David Coghlan
  • Paul Coughlan

Abstract

This article explores how Revan’s praxeology and learning formula act as the foundation for the authors’ enactment of the scholarship of their teaching practice. Linking to accreditation requirement of assurance of learning the authors describe two undergraduate courses that they teach and reflect on how Revan’s praxeology of systems alpha, beta and gamma and his learning formula, L = P + Q provide a framework for understanding and enacting their scholarship of teaching. They offer their experience and reflection for other academics to engage with the scholarship of their respective practice.

Suggested Citation

  • David Coghlan & Paul Coughlan, 2018. "Yes we can: towards assurance of learning by scholarly academics through a praxeology of the scholarship of teaching," Action Learning: Research and Practice, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 15(3), pages 210-223, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:taf:alresp:v:15:y:2018:i:3:p:210-223
    DOI: 10.1080/14767333.2018.1472552
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/14767333.2018.1472552
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/14767333.2018.1472552?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. David Coghlan, 2012. "Understanding insight in the context of Q," Action Learning: Research and Practice, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 9(3), pages 247-258, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.

      More about this item

      Statistics

      Access and download statistics

      Corrections

      All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:alresp:v:15:y:2018:i:3:p:210-223. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

      If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

      If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

      If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

      For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/CALR20 .

      Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

      IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.