IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/accted/v35y2026i3p399-424.html

Knowledge in accounting: using semantic density to explore complexity in threshold concepts and terminology

Author

Listed:
  • Mariam Bardien
  • Ilse Lubbe

Abstract

Students often struggle to grasp accounting concepts and terminology and connect the meaning of these concepts to their practical application. These challenges arise when accounting students engage with complex ideas and terms that demand the integration of knowledge from both accounting and other disciplines. This qualitative study investigates the complexity students face when interacting with threshold concepts in the specialised area of financial instruments. Using Legitimation Code Theory (LCT), the threshold concepts were analysed through the lens of semantic density, which highlights the complexity of meaning. A translation device was employed to demonstrate how semantic density intensifies as concepts become interconnected. The findings offer insights into the embedded complexity within these threshold concepts and how the development of systemic conceptual links is crucial for building knowledge. The paper concludes by providing examples of pedagogical approaches that educators can implement to help students form conceptual connections, thus enhancing their understanding of specialised accounting knowledge and improving the overall teaching and learning experience in accounting.

Suggested Citation

  • Mariam Bardien & Ilse Lubbe, 2026. "Knowledge in accounting: using semantic density to explore complexity in threshold concepts and terminology," Accounting Education, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 35(3), pages 399-424, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:accted:v:35:y:2026:i:3:p:399-424
    DOI: 10.1080/09639284.2025.2482686
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/09639284.2025.2482686
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/09639284.2025.2482686?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:accted:v:35:y:2026:i:3:p:399-424. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/RAED20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.