IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/accted/v34y2025i5p822-853.html

Boundaries, barriers, or bridges? Unraveling the integration of doctoral students in the accounting academic community

Author

Listed:
  • Alann Inaldo Silva de Sá Bartoluzzio
  • João Paulo Resende de Lima
  • Fernanda Filgueiras Sauerbronn

Abstract

We aim to understand how the accounting academic community shapes and socializes doctoral students. From a critical-qualitative stance, the analyses found support in Étienne Wenger’s Social Learning Systems, focusing on the relationship between doctoral students’ socialization and the accounting academic community – understood as a Community of Practice (CoP). Our findings indicate that doctoral students, as Legitimate Peripheral Participants, do not become central members due to imposed communitarian limits. These limits work as an impediment to the relationship between the individual and the CoP. Some participants indicated a loss of meaning and episodes of epistemic violence that (re)produce community limits that define the ‘good accounting academic’, among other aspects, regarding boundaries and power dynamics. We contribute to expanding the discussion on Social Systems of Learning and CoPs by presenting empirical evidence of the barriers between CoPs and the professional socialization process.

Suggested Citation

  • Alann Inaldo Silva de Sá Bartoluzzio & João Paulo Resende de Lima & Fernanda Filgueiras Sauerbronn, 2025. "Boundaries, barriers, or bridges? Unraveling the integration of doctoral students in the accounting academic community," Accounting Education, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 34(5), pages 822-853, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:accted:v:34:y:2025:i:5:p:822-853
    DOI: 10.1080/09639284.2024.2326963
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/09639284.2024.2326963
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/09639284.2024.2326963?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:accted:v:34:y:2025:i:5:p:822-853. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/RAED20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.