IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/accted/v33y2024i1p27-45.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Professional contacts and the decision to become an auditor. An analysis using linkedIn

Author

Listed:
  • Begoña Navallas
  • Cristina del Campo
  • María-del-Mar Camacho-Miñano

Abstract

This paper aims to analyse how contact with professional auditors influences undergraduates’ career decisions to become an auditor as a public interest profession. Students may decide not to join an auditing company due to stereotypes of auditors and, consequently, audit firms may not find professionals with needed skills. Undergraduates were selected by a professional body to shadow an audit team for a workday. A pre-post survey was conducted with the participants of the activity to analyse their perceptions. Some years later, their LinkedIn profiles were checked to determine whether the alumni work or have been working in the auditing industry. The survey responses were linked to the employment history that the former participants have posted on LinkedIn. Our results corroborate the effectiveness of contacts with auditors that improve participants’ perceptions about their intention to become an auditor and consideration of auditing as a public interest profession. Thus, negative perceptions of auditors could be minimised with greater understanding of the job.

Suggested Citation

  • Begoña Navallas & Cristina del Campo & María-del-Mar Camacho-Miñano, 2024. "Professional contacts and the decision to become an auditor. An analysis using linkedIn," Accounting Education, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 33(1), pages 27-45, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:accted:v:33:y:2024:i:1:p:27-45
    DOI: 10.1080/09639284.2022.2121169
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/09639284.2022.2121169
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/09639284.2022.2121169?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:accted:v:33:y:2024:i:1:p:27-45. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/RAED20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.