IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/accted/v32y2023i6p597-625.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Formative assessment in accounting: student perceptions and implications of continuous assessment

Author

Listed:
  • Elka Johansson
  • Sutharson Kanapathippillai
  • Arifur Khan
  • Steven Dellaportas

Abstract

Research on formative assessment in accounting education examines the learning outcomes stemming from e-assessment or formative assessment within a stand-alone subject, but few studies examine the benefits and implications of continuous formative assessment or the perceptions of students who undertake formative assessment. The findings of continuous formative assessment introduced in a subject on intermediate financial accounting suggest that students benefit incrementally from multiple attempts at the formative assessment with optimal performance achieved at 7 attempts from a total of 10 opportunities. However, students also highlighted that the additional workload to participate in continuous formative assessment presented a major participatory constraint. The results of this study are consistent with the proposition that formative assessment improves students’ academic performance, but student perceptions on the benefits of formative assessment differ, particularly students with prior accounting knowledge and international students who appeared more receptive to formative assessment and feedback compared with domestic students.

Suggested Citation

  • Elka Johansson & Sutharson Kanapathippillai & Arifur Khan & Steven Dellaportas, 2023. "Formative assessment in accounting: student perceptions and implications of continuous assessment," Accounting Education, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 32(6), pages 597-625, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:accted:v:32:y:2023:i:6:p:597-625
    DOI: 10.1080/09639284.2022.2091411
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/09639284.2022.2091411
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/09639284.2022.2091411?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:accted:v:32:y:2023:i:6:p:597-625. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/RAED20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.