IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/accted/v27y2018i6p613-631.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Instructional strategies and students’ performance in accounting: an evaluation of those strategies and the role of gender

Author

Listed:
  • Seedwell T. M. Sithole

Abstract

This paper investigates the effects of two instructional strategies on accounting students’ performance and the gender differences within the strategies. In an experiment, undergraduate students at an Australian university were randomly assigned to either the self-managed or split-attention condition. Participants were required to self-manage graphical and textual presentations in introductory accounting as an alternative to learning by studying instructor-managed materials. Students in the self-managed group were guided on how to integrate spatially separated text and diagrammatic information by moving text as close as possible to associated parts of a diagram. Results indicated significant differences between the two presentation formats. In addition, significant interactions between gender and presentation format were found. Follow-up analysis showed that females benefited by using self-management techniques than males. The gender differences have implications for instructional design, both in the manner in which the text and graphs are structured and in the way information is presented.

Suggested Citation

  • Seedwell T. M. Sithole, 2018. "Instructional strategies and students’ performance in accounting: an evaluation of those strategies and the role of gender," Accounting Education, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 27(6), pages 613-631, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:accted:v:27:y:2018:i:6:p:613-631
    DOI: 10.1080/09639284.2017.1361852
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/09639284.2017.1361852
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/09639284.2017.1361852?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:accted:v:27:y:2018:i:6:p:613-631. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/RAED20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.