Author
Listed:
- David Stout
- James Borden
- Melinda German
- Thomas Monahan
Abstract
Accounting programmes are being challenged (e.g. Albrecht and Sack, 2000) to make accounting curricula more relevant and to present assessment data regarding the efficacy of course and curricular offerings. In addition, assessment is embedded in current accreditation standards in the USA by the Association to Advance Collegiate Schools of Business (AACSB) International as fundamentally important to motivating continuous improvement (AACSB 2005). However, survey results in this area (viz., Kimmel et al., 1998, Issues in Accounting Education, 13(4), pp. 851-868 and Calderon et al., 2003, Best Practices in Accounting Program Assessment, Sarasota, FL: Teaching and Curriculum Section, American Accounting Association) indicate that assessment is not as widespread as might be expected. Further, Akers et al. (1997 Issues in Accounting Education, 12(2), pp. 259-280) note that the accounting education literature is limited with respect to descriptive accounts of assessment programme design and implementation results. This paper offers a framework, consisting of three key attributes (broad-based involvement, multi-trait/multi-method approach, and assessment follow-up), that can be used to guide the development and implementation of a programme-level assessment plan in accounting. A case study applies this framework to the development and implementation of an assessment plan for a graduate accounting programme in the USA. This plan includes multiple assessment measures and provides feedback regarding both academic (curriculum-related) and administrative (operational) dimensions of performance. To demonstrate the value of such a plan, a discussion of programme changes made in response to assessment data collected to date is included. While the application of this framework is to a USA context, the framework is such that it can be used more generally to guide the design and implementation of an effective programme-level assessment plan.
Suggested Citation
David Stout & James Borden & Melinda German & Thomas Monahan, 2005.
"Designing and implementing a comprehensive assessment plan for a graduate accounting programme,"
Accounting Education, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 14(4), pages 395-410.
Handle:
RePEc:taf:accted:v:14:y:2005:i:4:p:395-410
DOI: 10.1080/06939280500346045
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to
for a different version of it.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:accted:v:14:y:2005:i:4:p:395-410. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/RAED20 .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.