IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/acctbr/v56y2026i3p463-491.html

Strategic factors and the use of risk analysis techniques in strategic investment decisions

Author

Listed:
  • Jari Huikku
  • Jouko Karjalainen
  • Tomi Seppälä

Abstract

Risk analysis techniques (RATs) greatly support managers in obtaining a more comprehensive view of the threats and opportunities of strategic investment proposals. Our study investigates what strategic factors influence the use of RATs. Specifically, we address the frequency of use of the most common RATs, such as sensitivity, scenario, simulation, and CAPM analyses. We investigate firms’ strategic factors, such as corporate strategy, business strategy, and financial strategy. We test our hypotheses using multiple linear regression and data from 105 structured interviews from among the 150 largest Finnish manufacturing companies. We contribute to prior literature by showing that corporate strategy (parenting style) moderates the effect between business strategy and the use of RATs. Previous literature suggests that RATs are likely less useful in prospector-type business strategies entailing high external uncertainty. Nevertheless, we show that prospectors using the strategic planning style – a style suggested to suit corporations with high synergy potential between business units – employ RATs more frequently than the prospectors using the other parenting styles. We also provide clear evidence that difficulties in the availability of funding encourage companies to use RATs more frequently.

Suggested Citation

  • Jari Huikku & Jouko Karjalainen & Tomi Seppälä, 2026. "Strategic factors and the use of risk analysis techniques in strategic investment decisions," Accounting and Business Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 56(3), pages 463-491, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:acctbr:v:56:y:2026:i:3:p:463-491
    DOI: 10.1080/00014788.2025.2486753
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/00014788.2025.2486753
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/00014788.2025.2486753?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:acctbr:v:56:y:2026:i:3:p:463-491. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/RABR20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.