IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/acctbr/v56y2026i2p254-292.html

Managerial ability, ESG and credit ratings

Author

Listed:
  • Shirin Yusupova
  • Grant Richardson
  • Meiting Lu

Abstract

This study examines whether managerial ability impacts the positive association between environmental, social and governance (ESG) performance and credit ratings. We find that managerial ability magnifies this positive association. We further extend our analyses to examine the controversial issue of greenwashing. We find that the positive impact of managerial ability and ESG performance on credit ratings is stronger when firms engage in greenwashing. Our results are also economically significant and, therefore, meaningful. Furthermore, our baseline results are robust to alternative measures of managerial ability and ESG performance, in addition to various endogeneity checks. Cross-sectional analyses demonstrate that the interaction effect of managerial ability and ESG performance on credit ratings is stronger (weaker) in firms with inferior (superior) information environments. We also observe that the interaction effect is stronger (weaker) for firms with smaller (larger) boards of directors. Overall, this study improves our understanding of the important influence of managerial ability and ESG performance on credit ratings. Its findings call for close attention to ESG performance and the controversial issue of greenwashing.

Suggested Citation

  • Shirin Yusupova & Grant Richardson & Meiting Lu, 2026. "Managerial ability, ESG and credit ratings," Accounting and Business Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 56(2), pages 254-292, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:acctbr:v:56:y:2026:i:2:p:254-292
    DOI: 10.1080/00014788.2025.2485446
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/00014788.2025.2485446
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/00014788.2025.2485446?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:acctbr:v:56:y:2026:i:2:p:254-292. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/RABR20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.