IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/acctbr/v56y2026i1p41-68.html

From no materiality to double materiality: a long-run conceptual analysis of corporate reporting regulation

Author

Listed:
  • Christopher Nobes

Abstract

This paper first examines the concept of materiality in regulations on corporate reporting. The focus is Europe, including international standards as endorsed in Europe. The paper traces the concept of materiality from its first appearances in the 1970s (in EU Directives and UK accounting standards) through to the recent international and EU sustainability standards. The texts of these documents are analysed to reveal how the importance and definition of materiality has varied over time. In some documents, materiality is absent but in others it is one of only three or four key concepts. The scope of materiality had been gradually narrowed in recent years in IFRS, but that was reversed by the concept of impact materiality in GRI standards and then the double materiality of the EU’s sustainability standards. The paper suggests that the concept of impact materiality is unclear. It explains how double materiality entails more disclosure than single. The ambiguity of the concepts is illustrated by examining the changing signifiers used in translations of regulations and standards. The paper then finds that researchers have not taken sufficient account of materiality when scoring corporate compliance with disclosure requirements. Policy recommendations for regulators and researchers follow.

Suggested Citation

  • Christopher Nobes, 2026. "From no materiality to double materiality: a long-run conceptual analysis of corporate reporting regulation," Accounting and Business Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 56(1), pages 41-68, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:acctbr:v:56:y:2026:i:1:p:41-68
    DOI: 10.1080/00014788.2025.2579303
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/00014788.2025.2579303
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/00014788.2025.2579303?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:acctbr:v:56:y:2026:i:1:p:41-68. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/RABR20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.