IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/acctbr/v55y2025i7p750-779.html

The impact of the JOBS act on the costs of going public: evidence from long-term audit costs

Author

Listed:
  • Sudip Gupta
  • Joseph A. Micale
  • Ashok Robin
  • Rong Yang

Abstract

The Jumpstart Our Business Startups (JOBS) Act (2012) allows reduced compliance costs for IPOs with less than $1 billion in revenues. While prior research has focused on the Act’s ability to reduce short-term IPO compliance costs, we investigate how the Act affected key observable compliance costs – audit fees – over the five years the issuing firm is eligible for this reduced level of disclosure/compliance. In contrast to prior findings of increased short-term audit costs, we find that long-term audit costs decreased by 16.6 percent, or $172,000 for IPO firms following JOBS, relative to the change fees for in control firms unaffected by the regulation. After investigating other consequences of the Act, we find greater information uncertainty for affected firms following JOBS. However, we find lower accrual-based earnings management as responses to these information frictions. We find the reductions in earnings management is driven by firms with the greatest information uncertainty with investors, suggesting that affected firms take additional steps to mitigate the information risks in light of their inherently riskier IPOs. Overall, we present a fuller picture of the costs/benefits and risk mitigation in post-JOBS IPOs.

Suggested Citation

  • Sudip Gupta & Joseph A. Micale & Ashok Robin & Rong Yang, 2025. "The impact of the JOBS act on the costs of going public: evidence from long-term audit costs," Accounting and Business Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 55(7), pages 750-779, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:acctbr:v:55:y:2025:i:7:p:750-779
    DOI: 10.1080/00014788.2024.2382298
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/00014788.2024.2382298
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/00014788.2024.2382298?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:acctbr:v:55:y:2025:i:7:p:750-779. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/RABR20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.