IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/acctbr/v55y2025i6p668-692.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Escaping ‘Groundhog Day’: the transformative possibilities of reconceptualising audit

Author

Listed:
  • Christopher Humphrey
  • Brendan O’Dwyer
  • Martin Martinoff

Abstract

The statutory company audit can be a puzzling phenomenon. While heralded as a public interested function, its resulting audit reports are only addressed to the members of the audited company. Audit may be widely acknowledged as a social construction, but it has remained conceptually static, with a recycling of reform proposals and a resulting, persistent audit expectations gap. Recent responses to this state of affairs, however, have included calls for a ‘dynamic repair’ of audit and an official proposal by the Brydon review for the UK government to give legislative backing to a significantly expanded purpose for audit. This paper further advances such proposals by illuminating the transformative possibilities of conceptualising audit as an innovation ecosystem in its own right and classifying auditors as ecosystem engineers. Collectively, such a conceptual reconfiguration can serve to enhance both the social purposefulness of audit and its public interested sense of professionalism by freeing audit from the constraints of excessive standardisation and promoting its inherent, functional diversity.

Suggested Citation

  • Christopher Humphrey & Brendan O’Dwyer & Martin Martinoff, 2025. "Escaping ‘Groundhog Day’: the transformative possibilities of reconceptualising audit," Accounting and Business Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 55(6), pages 668-692, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:acctbr:v:55:y:2025:i:6:p:668-692
    DOI: 10.1080/00014788.2024.2375713
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/00014788.2024.2375713
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/00014788.2024.2375713?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:acctbr:v:55:y:2025:i:6:p:668-692. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/RABR20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.