IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/acctbr/v55y2025i4p389-425.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Non-Big 6 audit firms’ access to external resources through inter-organisational relationships

Author

Listed:
  • Jeff Boone
  • Lele Chen
  • Juan Mao

Abstract

Small audit firms try to reduce their resource constraints in serving clients by creating inter-organisational relationships (IORs) through membership in accounting networks or in agreements with individual firms. Through these relationships, firms have access to audit manuals/methodology, personnel, and may perform joint audits and joint marketing of their audit services. We identify the existence of IORs from PCAOB Form 2 filings and test whether audit quality and fees vary cross-sectionally as a function of the specific resource obtained from the IOR. We find evidence that firms with access to audit technology through IORs charge higher audit fees and provide higher quality audits, in terms of smaller clients’ performance-matched discretionary accruals, higher auditors’ likelihood of issuing going concern opinions to financially distressed clients, and fewer audit deficiencies identified in PCAOB inspection reports. The findings highlight the importance of access to audit technology through IORs in improving small audit firms’ real and perceived audit quality.

Suggested Citation

  • Jeff Boone & Lele Chen & Juan Mao, 2025. "Non-Big 6 audit firms’ access to external resources through inter-organisational relationships," Accounting and Business Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 55(4), pages 389-425, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:acctbr:v:55:y:2025:i:4:p:389-425
    DOI: 10.1080/00014788.2024.2364199
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/00014788.2024.2364199
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/00014788.2024.2364199?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:acctbr:v:55:y:2025:i:4:p:389-425. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/RABR20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.