IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/acctbr/v55y2025i3p247-270.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Credibility-enhancing tactics for social media corporate disclosures

Author

Listed:
  • Wei Sun

Abstract

This study examines two credibility-enhancing tactics when managers use Twitter as a platform to disclose a message about an employee training programme, which is an important dimension of corporate social responsibility (CSR). I conduct an experiment where I manipulate (1) whether a firm’s CEO retweets the company disclosure tweet in their personal Twitter account (hereafter, ‘retweeting’), and (2) whether the company’s tweet mentions the organisation that cooperates with the company’s CSR activities when the organisation, as an involved party, has a verified Twitter account (hereafter, ‘mentioning’). I document higher disclosure credibility for retweeting than non-retweeting, as it establishes a closer association between the CEO and the message. In addition, mentioning increases the social presence of the parties involved, as users can observe the interactions between them and the disclosing firm in real time. Furthermore, I find that the higher social presence of an involved party (e.g. customers, suppliers, and managers) due to mentioning results in higher disclosure credibility. Finally, investors are more likely to sceptically scrutinise signals from an internal party, which makes CEO retweeting less effective than mentioning. The effect of retweeting is subdued when both tactics are used.

Suggested Citation

  • Wei Sun, 2025. "Credibility-enhancing tactics for social media corporate disclosures," Accounting and Business Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 55(3), pages 247-270, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:acctbr:v:55:y:2025:i:3:p:247-270
    DOI: 10.1080/00014788.2024.2314452
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/00014788.2024.2314452
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/00014788.2024.2314452?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:acctbr:v:55:y:2025:i:3:p:247-270. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/RABR20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.