IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/acctbr/v53y2023i7p821-852.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Accounting firms’ employee satisfaction and audit fees

Author

Listed:
  • Hongkang Xu
  • Mai Dao
  • Hua Sun

Abstract

In this study, we examine whether audit fees are associated with job satisfaction among accounting firms’ employees. We use novel data obtained from social media site Glassdoor.com and find negative associations between audit fees and accounting firms’ job satisfaction. Our results are robust to alternative measures of employee satisfaction and correct for potential endogeneity problems using 2SLS regression models with instrumental variables (IVs), audit office fixed effects, and changes analysis. Our additional analysis reveals that compared to former employees’ ratings, current employees’ ratings play a more important role in determining the pricing of audit services. Moreover, audit fees are higher for firms audited by accounting firms with greater employee satisfaction and providing more nonaudit services. We further find that employee satisfaction at any audit level is associated with lower audit fees. Our study extends the extant literature on employee satisfaction and provides useful information for accounting firms regarding the importance of employee satisfaction to audit fees.

Suggested Citation

  • Hongkang Xu & Mai Dao & Hua Sun, 2023. "Accounting firms’ employee satisfaction and audit fees," Accounting and Business Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 53(7), pages 821-852, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:acctbr:v:53:y:2023:i:7:p:821-852
    DOI: 10.1080/00014788.2022.2049193
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/00014788.2022.2049193
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/00014788.2022.2049193?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:acctbr:v:53:y:2023:i:7:p:821-852. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/RABR20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.