IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/acctbr/v50y2020i3p238-268.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Accounting for fixed assets and investment efficiency: a real options framework

Author

Listed:
  • Lufei Ruan

Abstract

In a perfect world, a manager's investment in fixed assets would increase with the assets’ profitability. However, when managers privately know their project profitability and care about their company's short-term share price, managers of less profitable firms face the temptation to overinvest in order to pool with strong firms. This creates pressure on strong firms to overinvest to the point where weak firms cease to find it worthwhile to mimic strong firms. I show that, when firms have abandonment options, the willingness of a weak firm's manager to mimic depends on the expected future resale value of the fixed assets. An impairment policy (prohibiting write-ups) reduces the value of abandonment options, which are particularly important for weak firms. The reduced value of the abandonment options decreases the amount of overinvestment required by strong firms to separate themselves from weak firms. I also show that allowing firms to choose depreciation schedules improves investment efficiency: in equilibrium, strong firms choose faster depreciation. Last, in the staged-investments setting, I show that an impairment policy also mitigates underinvestment at an initial stage. These findings rationalise the current accounting standards for fixed assets and contribute to related policy debates on accounting measurement.

Suggested Citation

  • Lufei Ruan, 2020. "Accounting for fixed assets and investment efficiency: a real options framework," Accounting and Business Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 50(3), pages 238-268, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:acctbr:v:50:y:2020:i:3:p:238-268
    DOI: 10.1080/00014788.2019.1675492
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/00014788.2019.1675492
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/00014788.2019.1675492?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:acctbr:v:50:y:2020:i:3:p:238-268. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/RABR20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.