IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/accfor/v50y2026i3p533-561.html

Audit regulation and auditors’ behaviour: the impact of auditor tenure disclosure on audit quality

Author

Listed:
  • David Castillo-Merino
  • Josep Garcia-Bladon
  • Gonzalo Rodríguez-Pérez

Abstract

This paper investigates the impact of mandatory auditor tenure disclosure in the auditor’s report on auditors’ behaviour regarding audit quality. Specifically, we examine audit outcomes following the implementation of PCAOB Auditing Standard (AS) 3101, which requires auditors to disclose the year they began serving consecutively as the company’s statutory auditor. The rule became effective for fiscal years ending on or after December 15, 2017. Using a differences-in-differences approach, we assess changes in audit quality by comparing firms subject to the regulation in 2017 with those not yet required to disclose auditor tenure. While previous research has documented investors’ reactions to AS 3101, its effect on audit quality remains unexplored. We find some evidence suggesting that the transition from voluntary to mandatory disclosure influenced auditors’ decisions, leading to more conservative financial reporting and higher audit quality. Notably, we do not find strong evidence that the effect is more pronounced for firms with long-tenured auditors in the post-implementation period. Rather, the greater transparency, reliability, and salience of tenure information following the PCAOB’s mandate appear to have influenced auditors regardless of tenure length. Plausibly anticipating heightened public scrutiny, auditors across tenure levels adjusted their behaviour accordingly, contributing to improved audit quality.

Suggested Citation

  • David Castillo-Merino & Josep Garcia-Bladon & Gonzalo Rodríguez-Pérez, 2026. "Audit regulation and auditors’ behaviour: the impact of auditor tenure disclosure on audit quality," Accounting Forum, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 50(3), pages 533-561, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:accfor:v:50:y:2026:i:3:p:533-561
    DOI: 10.1080/01559982.2025.2548133
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/01559982.2025.2548133
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/01559982.2025.2548133?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:accfor:v:50:y:2026:i:3:p:533-561. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/racc .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.