IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/accfor/v50y2026i2p215-244.html

Does gender diversity in corporate boards and executive management teams influence carbon performance? Evidence from Europe

Author

Listed:
  • Faizul Haque
  • Gifty Adjei-Mensah
  • Thi Hong Hanh Nguyen
  • Collins G. Ntim

Abstract

We examine how gender diversity in both corporate boards and executive management teams influence both procedure-oriented carbon management performance (PCMP) and real carbon emission reduction performance (RCRP) of European listed firms. Drawing on multiple theoretical perspectives, our empirical models employ firm fixed-effects estimators to analyse a large dataset, consisting of 5327 firm-year observations, covering a period of fifteen years. Our findings are three-fold. First, our primary evidence suggests that gender diversity in both corporate boards and executive management teams has a statistically significant positive association with PCMP and RCRP. Second, we provide robust evidence on the link between female directors’ cognitive attributes and PCMP, as well as RCRP. Third, we find that board gender diversity reinforces the positive influence of gender-diverse executive management teams on PCMP and RCRP. Overall, our study results suggest that female directors and executives play complementary roles in influencing and shaping a company's response to global climate risk. Our results are generally robust to controlling for governance mechanisms, alternative measures/estimations and endogeneities. Our findings have implications for policies relating to gender-responsive governance reforms, as well as the integration of gender diversity into firm-level, country-specific and regional frameworks for climate change policies and reforms.

Suggested Citation

  • Faizul Haque & Gifty Adjei-Mensah & Thi Hong Hanh Nguyen & Collins G. Ntim, 2026. "Does gender diversity in corporate boards and executive management teams influence carbon performance? Evidence from Europe," Accounting Forum, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 50(2), pages 215-244, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:accfor:v:50:y:2026:i:2:p:215-244
    DOI: 10.1080/01559982.2024.2423989
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/01559982.2024.2423989
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/01559982.2024.2423989?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:accfor:v:50:y:2026:i:2:p:215-244. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/racc .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.