Author
Listed:
- Giacomo Pigatto
- Lino Cinquini
- Maria Serena Chiucchi
- Andrea Tenucci
Abstract
This research explores how and to what extent companies can integrate sustainable development goals (SDGs) into their capital investment decisions. For a company that wants to become sustainable, evaluating where best to invest one's capital presents a practical problem because most tools for assessing returns on investment rely solely on financial indicators, not on broader measures of worth, such as environmental or social impacts. Additionally, existing frameworks that incorporate non-financial indicators tend to be targeted at shareholders looking to invest in entire companies, not at companies looking for ways to embed the SDGs into their capital outlays. To solve this problem, we undertook interventionist research devised around serendipity theory where we worked with a group of companies to develop a tool for helping companies to align their capital investments with specific SDG indicators. The result was a co-developed framework for supporting decisions about a company's capital investments informed by the SDGs. The research lasted for 17 months and evolved through five phases: identifying the problem; selecting a pilot investment and identifying the SDG targets; identifying key performance indicators (KPIs); critically assessing the KPIs and finalising the KPIs. This research contributes to accounting theory and practice in two ways. First, it outlines serendipity theory as an effective framework for guiding interventionist research towards finding helpful solutions to practical accounting problems. Second, it offers a 4-step method for integrating the SDGs into capital investment decisions. This answers the call for accounting research to engage with companies in the SDGs' pursuit.
Suggested Citation
Giacomo Pigatto & Lino Cinquini & Maria Serena Chiucchi & Andrea Tenucci, 2025.
"Integrating the SDGs into capital investments: an interventionist research study informed by a serendipitous approach,"
Accounting Forum, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 49(5), pages 950-977, October.
Handle:
RePEc:taf:accfor:v:49:y:2025:i:5:p:950-977
DOI: 10.1080/01559982.2024.2408502
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to
for a different version of it.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:accfor:v:49:y:2025:i:5:p:950-977. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/racc .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.