Author
Listed:
- Jing Ning
- Luqiao Zhang
- Biao Mi
- Jessica Hong Yang
- Lei Tao
Abstract
This study investigates the interaction between a tone signaller and receiver through managerial tone on a conference call. Based on a signalling framework, we examine the following research questions: Does the signal (tone) match the latent information it intends to convey? Can a receiver (analyst) interpret the signal correctly and send feedback to confirm (or disconfirm) it? Does the signalling environment impact signalling effectiveness? Using a sample of 3680 transcripts of earnings conference calls from 241 UK firms in the FTSE 350 Index, we find that managerial tone can produce effective signals that match private information from managers. Analysts understand tone signals accurately and send confirmation feedback to managers. They revise their forecasts upward (downward) following more (less) optimistic managerial tones. They consistently confirm and respond to managers with a similar tone. Analysts with superior expertise, experience and ability better understand the tone signal, leading to a larger reduction in forecast error. The information environment can moderate signalling effectiveness. This shows that managerial tone represents a reliable signalling device for transmitting latent information on a firm’s quality and future performance and that receivers can understand this signal correctly. This study highlights the signalling role of managerial tone in managers and analysts’ communication.HIGHLIGHTSManagerial tone effectively communicates private information to analysts.Analysts accurately interpret tone signals and adjust forecasts accordingly.Analysts with superior expertise better understand tone, reducing forecast errors.Managerial tone's signalling effectiveness varies with information environment.
Suggested Citation
Jing Ning & Luqiao Zhang & Biao Mi & Jessica Hong Yang & Lei Tao, 2025.
"Signalling through managerial tone and analysts’ response,"
Accounting Forum, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 49(4), pages 803-829, August.
Handle:
RePEc:taf:accfor:v:49:y:2025:i:4:p:803-829
DOI: 10.1080/01559982.2024.2339911
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to
for a different version of it.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:accfor:v:49:y:2025:i:4:p:803-829. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/racc .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.