IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/accfor/v49y2025i2p336-368.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Ownership structure and climate-related corporate reporting

Author

Listed:
  • Tam Huy Nguyen
  • Vu Quang Trinh
  • Wenxi Chen

Abstract

We investigate the impacts of various types of corporate ownership structures (i.e. institutional, government, and managerial ownership) on climate-related corporate reporting as reflected in the levels of voluntary carbon disclosure. Using a sample of S&P 500 companies from 2015 to 2020 across both environmentally sensitive and non-environmentally sensitive industries, we find that diverse ownership structures have distinct impacts and preferences in corporate carbon disclosure. Specifically, government ownership is likely to promote transparency of carbon information. In contrast, the ownership held by institutional investors (total, short-term, and long-term), managers (i.e. CEOs, directors), and block-holders are negatively associated with the proactive greenhouse gas disclosure. We also find evidence that climate governance quality plays a positive moderating role in the relationship between two ownership types (i.e. long-term institutional investors and block-holder) and a firm’s climate-related corporate reporting. Our findings offer some practical insights for managers, regulators, and policymakers to focus on the configuration of corporate ownership in the context of improving green practices.

Suggested Citation

  • Tam Huy Nguyen & Vu Quang Trinh & Wenxi Chen, 2025. "Ownership structure and climate-related corporate reporting," Accounting Forum, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 49(2), pages 336-368, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:accfor:v:49:y:2025:i:2:p:336-368
    DOI: 10.1080/01559982.2024.2301850
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/01559982.2024.2301850
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/01559982.2024.2301850?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:accfor:v:49:y:2025:i:2:p:336-368. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/racc .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.