IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/accfor/v47y2023i3p307-332.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A systematic literature review of Indigenous Peoples and accounting research: critical Indigenous theory as a step toward relationship and reconciliation

Author

Listed:
  • Merridee Bujaki
  • Camillo Lento
  • Irfan Butt
  • Nathaniel Anderson
  • Cheryl Ogima

Abstract

Research exploring the intersection of accounting and Indigenous Peoples took off in the 1990s. We introduce principles of critical Indigenous theory into this field. We suggest that Indigenous understandings of ontology, epistemology, axiology, and methodology should form the basis of more future research into accounting and Indigenous Peoples. Before this can be done, however, a clear understanding of recent research on accounting and Indigenous Peoples is needed. We synthesise research in this area through a systematic literature review that identifies 72 relevant articles from 1979–2020. We undertake both content and thematic analysis of these articles. We find existing literature is largely grounded in Western understandings of ontology, epistemology, axiology, and methodology. We identify opportunities for insights from CIT to inform future accounting research with Indigenous Peoples as a step towards building relationships, respect, and reconciliation.

Suggested Citation

  • Merridee Bujaki & Camillo Lento & Irfan Butt & Nathaniel Anderson & Cheryl Ogima, 2023. "A systematic literature review of Indigenous Peoples and accounting research: critical Indigenous theory as a step toward relationship and reconciliation," Accounting Forum, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 47(3), pages 307-332, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:accfor:v:47:y:2023:i:3:p:307-332
    DOI: 10.1080/01559982.2022.2051295
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/01559982.2022.2051295
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/01559982.2022.2051295?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:accfor:v:47:y:2023:i:3:p:307-332. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/racc .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.