IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/accfor/v44y2020i1p64-98.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Cognitive approach to understand the impact of conflict of interests on accounting professionals’ decision-making behaviour

Author

Listed:
  • Maria Ishaque

Abstract

This paper adopts a cognitive approach, by integrating social cognitive theory and throughput model, for examining the process through which conflict of interests affects the accounting professionals’ decision-making behaviour. The model has been tested by conducting a quasi-experiment with 105 professionals from the Big Four accounting firms in the UK. The low positive outcome expectancy of compliant decision-making, high perceived difficulty in making compliant decisions and less ethical judgements are evidenced to be the situational cognitive predictors, and high propensity to morally disengage the dispositional cognitive predictor of the likelihood of deviant decision-making behaviour. The proposed cognitive approach provides a novel perspective for investigating decision-making behaviour in situations involving the conflict of interests. To facilitate effective management of conflict of interests, this study suggests implementing behavioural interventions for strengthening the accounting professionals’ independence in fact.

Suggested Citation

  • Maria Ishaque, 2020. "Cognitive approach to understand the impact of conflict of interests on accounting professionals’ decision-making behaviour," Accounting Forum, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 44(1), pages 64-98, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:taf:accfor:v:44:y:2020:i:1:p:64-98
    DOI: 10.1080/01559982.2019.1583303
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/01559982.2019.1583303
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/01559982.2019.1583303?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:accfor:v:44:y:2020:i:1:p:64-98. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/racc .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.