IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/accfor/v25y2001i1p7-30.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The corporate memory structure of expert portfolio managers: a multi‐trial free recall study

Author

Listed:
  • Neil J. Cocks
  • Errol R. Iselin
  • Divesh S. Sharma

Abstract

This research studied the memory structures for company information of twelve expert investment portfolio managers. These memory structures are important because they influence equity portfolio selection decisions worth billions of dollars. The structures have relevance to accounting and finance in that they should influence (1) the information accountants provide, (2) accounting and finance education, and (3) expert systems for investment portfolio management. Based on theory and an exploratory study, nine hypotheses were developed. These were tested in a multi‐trial free recall study. The research results showed that both expert portfolio managers and novices clustered their recall. The experts had higher clustering scores initially, but the novices’ scores increased at a faster rate over the trials. The experts used two schematic and four unidimensional bases of categorisation to assist in equity portfolio selection. Of these, industrial schemata seem to dominate in their memory structures. The experts used these industrial schemata to assist their recall. They do not, however, simply adopt the stock exchange’s industrial categories. They tend to lead rather than follow the exchange. While the experts used industrial schemata to facilitate recall, novices used more trivial bases. These findings supported all of the research hypotheses. Finally, the paper considers the implications of the findings for future research and accounting and finance practice.

Suggested Citation

  • Neil J. Cocks & Errol R. Iselin & Divesh S. Sharma, 2001. "The corporate memory structure of expert portfolio managers: a multi‐trial free recall study," Accounting Forum, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 25(1), pages 7-30, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:accfor:v:25:y:2001:i:1:p:7-30
    DOI: 10.1111/1467-6303.00053
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1111/1467-6303.00053
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/1467-6303.00053?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:accfor:v:25:y:2001:i:1:p:7-30. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/racc .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.