IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/accfor/v24y2000i1p5-29.html

Ecological Modernization And The Limits Of Environmental Accounting?

Author

Listed:
  • Jeff Everett
  • Dean Neu

Abstract

In the marketplace of ideas the discourse of ecological modernization— with its emphasis on win‐win solutions, the need for universal regulation and appeals to science—has been popular of late. Environmental accounting (EA) literatures have not been immune to the attractions of ecological modernization ideas. The strategic positioning of EA research within the discourse of ecological modernization has undoubtedly provided EA with much needed visibility and legitimacy within the academic community, and has likely encouraged corporations to ‘support’ (both in financial and ideological terms) the work of EA. Yet this discourse may ultimately be limiting. In this critical commentary we propose that the ‘ideological effect’ of ecological modernization is such that the intersection of ecological and social realms is ignored and issues of social justice are effectively erased, despite this discourse’s ‘radical’ or ‘critical’ aspirations. In other words, ecological modernization is a discourse of the status quo. Overall, EA’s harmonization with this discourse has the (un)intended effect of convincing us that the system is working, that ‘progress is being made.’ This distracts us from asking difficult questions regarding the role of environmental accounting in perpetuating unequal and exploitative social relations.

Suggested Citation

  • Jeff Everett & Dean Neu, 2000. "Ecological Modernization And The Limits Of Environmental Accounting?," Accounting Forum, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 24(1), pages 5-29, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:taf:accfor:v:24:y:2000:i:1:p:5-29
    DOI: 10.1111/1467-6303.00027
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1111/1467-6303.00027
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/1467-6303.00027?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:accfor:v:24:y:2000:i:1:p:5-29. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/racc .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.