IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/acceur/v21y2024i1p44-67.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The effect of mandatory extraction payment disclosures on corporate tax avoidance: evidence from the United Kingdom

Author

Listed:
  • Sameh Kobbi-Fakhfakh
  • Fatma Driss

Abstract

The study investigates whether mandatory extraction payment disclosures (EPD), a policy intervention involving Country-by-Country Reporting (CbCR) in extractive industries, affects corporate tax avoidance. Based on a sample of firms listed on the London Stock Exchange over the period from 2010 to 2021, and using the Difference-in-Differences (DiD) model including firm and year fixed effects, results showed a decline in the level of tax avoidance of British extractive firms post-EPD requirement implementation, relative to U.S. extractive/British manufacturing firms not subject to such a requirement. The findings highlight one of the unstated positive consequences of the EPD regulation implementation including discouraging tax avoidance. They should be informative to tax authorities and civil society as they continue to refine existing disclosure requirements and combat tax avoidance. They also support the U.S. Government Accountability Office (GAO)’s (2008) and Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD)’s (2015) arguments that CbCR facilitates understanding of corporate tax practices.

Suggested Citation

  • Sameh Kobbi-Fakhfakh & Fatma Driss, 2024. "The effect of mandatory extraction payment disclosures on corporate tax avoidance: evidence from the United Kingdom," Accounting in Europe, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 21(1), pages 44-67, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:acceur:v:21:y:2024:i:1:p:44-67
    DOI: 10.1080/17449480.2023.2290735
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/17449480.2023.2290735
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/17449480.2023.2290735?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:acceur:v:21:y:2024:i:1:p:44-67. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/RAIE20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.