IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/acceur/v19y2022i2p255-286.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

US comment Letter Writing to the IASB and Evolving SEC Views on the Use of IFRS

Author

Listed:
  • Robert K. Larson
  • Mark Myring
  • Raf Orens

Abstract

This paper investigates drivers of US lobbying on the International Accounting Standards Board (IASB) before, during, and after the Securities and Exchange Commission’s (SEC) active consideration to adopt International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS). Examining comment letters (CLs) for 148 IASB proposals from 2001 through 2014 finds that while a variety of US stakeholders lobbied, the response rates are low. CL writing in total and by preparers significantly increased during the peak of SEC interest (2007–2010), but afterwards significantly decreased. US writers focus more on key issues rather than responding to proposals earlier in the IASB’s due process. US writers lobbied more about topics also on the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB)’s agenda and larger US preparers were more likely to write CLs and write them more frequently than smaller preparers. Overall, response rates are associated with the likelihood that US stakeholders would need to comply with IFRS.

Suggested Citation

  • Robert K. Larson & Mark Myring & Raf Orens, 2022. "US comment Letter Writing to the IASB and Evolving SEC Views on the Use of IFRS," Accounting in Europe, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 19(2), pages 255-286, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:acceur:v:19:y:2022:i:2:p:255-286
    DOI: 10.1080/17449480.2022.2046281
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/17449480.2022.2046281
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/17449480.2022.2046281?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:acceur:v:19:y:2022:i:2:p:255-286. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/RAIE20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.