IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/acbsfi/v36y2026i1p1-29.html

‘Residual headway’ of Degrange’s Five General Accounts in nineteenth-century Italian accounting practices: insights from a case study

Author

Listed:
  • Carmelo Marisca
  • Guido Noto
  • Martin Quinn

Abstract

During the Italian post-Unification period from 1861, Italian accounting scholarship experienced a ‘golden age’. The contributions of scholars such as Francesco Marchi, Giuseppe Cerboni and Fabio Besta promoted accounting in Italy to the rank of science. During this flourishing period of new theories and approaches, previously adopted accounting systems were maintained in some businesses’ accounting practices and, for a certain period, were taught in professional schools. This applied particularly to the eighteenth-century accounting practices, such as the ‘Five General Accounts’ system introduced by Edmond Degrange. Using an institutional theory lens, this study explores the case of Rossi & Gagliardi, a Sicilian textile trader, who, despite newer accounting theories and systems promoted by Italian scholars, maintained a Five General Accounts system in a ‘residual headway’ scenario. A longitudinal analysis of its account books and other information sources from 1870 to 1917 reveals key factors for the maintenance of the Five General Accounts in an adapted form. Within the neo-institutionalist history theory of accounting, a classification of the degree of institutional pressures for change/adaptation of accounting systems is developed and used.

Suggested Citation

  • Carmelo Marisca & Guido Noto & Martin Quinn, 2026. "‘Residual headway’ of Degrange’s Five General Accounts in nineteenth-century Italian accounting practices: insights from a case study," Accounting History Review, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 36(1), pages 1-29, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:acbsfi:v:36:y:2026:i:1:p:1-29
    DOI: 10.1080/21552851.2025.2498022
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/21552851.2025.2498022
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/21552851.2025.2498022?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:acbsfi:v:36:y:2026:i:1:p:1-29. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/RABF21 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.