IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/acbsfi/v35y2025i3p259-280.html

Fair value accounting and Austrian business cycle theory: what can we learn from the German crisis of 1873?

Author

Listed:
  • Eduard Braun
  • Florian Follert

Abstract

This study builds on Austrian business cycle theory and empirical evidence to explore how macroeconomic conditions, investment decisions, and fair value accounting interact and contribute to economic crises. The German crash of 1873 serves as an early example of irrational exuberance, marking the decline of peak classical liberalism in German-speaking countries. We argue that liberal reforms, especially in corporate law, culminated in the abolition of the government concession or licence system in 1870, leading to a fundamental change in accounting rules and the adoption of fair value accounting. Our empirical analysis suggests that this shift led to an increase in dividend payments, paid out of capital instead of realised income. Following the dramatic expansion of the German money supply due to French reparations after the Franco-Prussian War, low interest rates – combined with the market-oriented accounting regime – fuelled unprecedented speculation, ultimately culminating in the system’s collapse in 1873. Our study contributes to the understanding of the interplay of macroeconomics and accounting, offering practical implications for policymakers and standard setters while drawing historical parallels to the 2008 global financial crisis.

Suggested Citation

  • Eduard Braun & Florian Follert, 2025. "Fair value accounting and Austrian business cycle theory: what can we learn from the German crisis of 1873?," Accounting History Review, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 35(3), pages 259-280, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:acbsfi:v:35:y:2025:i:3:p:259-280
    DOI: 10.1080/21552851.2025.2487258
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/21552851.2025.2487258
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/21552851.2025.2487258?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:acbsfi:v:35:y:2025:i:3:p:259-280. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/RABF21 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.