IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/acbsfi/v35y2025i2p171-204.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Institutional pressures, business model innovations and accounting evidence: the case of the Opera di Santa Maria del Fiore in Florence during the sixteenth century

Author

Listed:
  • Giacomo Manetti
  • Carmela Nitti
  • Marco Bellucci

Abstract

This study provides insights into the role played by institutionalism in the process of making innovations to the governance and business model used by the Opera di Santa Maria del Fiore (OSMF) during the sixteenth century. Our research relies on institutional theory and archival analyses in an effort to explore how the transition from the Florentine Republic to the Duchy influenced the control structure of the OSMF, which was the organisation that was responsible for the construction and maintenance of the cathedral of Florence, as well as its sources of revenues and costs. In response to pressure from Grand Duke Cosimo I de’ Medici, the OSMF transformed into a quasi-public organisation that was financed primarily by private funds from the sale of timber from the Casentino forest, whereas public funding from taxes began to play an increasingly marginal role. The contributions of this study are threefold: (i) it improves our understanding of the relationships among legitimacy theory, coercive isomorphism, and the governance of quasi-public organisations in the sixteenth century; (ii) it innovatively applies the contemporary notion of business models to the institutional context of the late Italian Renaissance; and (iii) it offers a framework for diachronic analyses of financial statements and the corresponding use of accounting as a tool in efforts to explore social history.

Suggested Citation

  • Giacomo Manetti & Carmela Nitti & Marco Bellucci, 2025. "Institutional pressures, business model innovations and accounting evidence: the case of the Opera di Santa Maria del Fiore in Florence during the sixteenth century," Accounting History Review, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 35(2), pages 171-204, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:acbsfi:v:35:y:2025:i:2:p:171-204
    DOI: 10.1080/21552851.2025.2462334
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/21552851.2025.2462334
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/21552851.2025.2462334?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:acbsfi:v:35:y:2025:i:2:p:171-204. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/RABF21 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.