IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/acbsfi/v35y2025i1p67-99.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Legitimising programmes of government by means of accounting. Promoting a railway system in the Grand Duchy of Tuscany: the Leghorn-Florence Railway (1838–1841)

Author

Listed:
  • Valerio Antonelli
  • Emanuela Mattia Cafaro
  • Raffaele D’Alessio

Abstract

Combining private initiatives with public interest was a defining feature of nineteenth-century European economic policy, particularly in the development of railway systems. In the Grand Duchy of Tuscany, Robert Stephenson – renowned as the ‘king of the railways’ – played a pivotal role in advancing a railway network linking Leghorn, Pisa, and Florence. His report, emphasising financial feasibility, strongly influenced the government’s decision to prioritise private capital and management for this transformative project. Governmentality and research into legitimisation strategies further our understanding of the interaction of political discourse, banks and investors interests, local communities’ aspirations, cultural élites and bourgeoisie consent for the project of such a railway system across Tuscany. Based on governmentality and legitimisation theory, this study demonstrates how accounting practices, represented by Stephenson’s report, legitimised and drove the railway initiative in the Grand Duchy of Tuscany, aligning political objectives, investor confidence, and community aspirations. By revealing the strategic use of financial data to shape consensus, the research provides new insights into the political impact of accounting and its critical role in fostering infrastructure development in Tuscany.

Suggested Citation

  • Valerio Antonelli & Emanuela Mattia Cafaro & Raffaele D’Alessio, 2025. "Legitimising programmes of government by means of accounting. Promoting a railway system in the Grand Duchy of Tuscany: the Leghorn-Florence Railway (1838–1841)," Accounting History Review, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 35(1), pages 67-99, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:acbsfi:v:35:y:2025:i:1:p:67-99
    DOI: 10.1080/21552851.2025.2450655
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/21552851.2025.2450655
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/21552851.2025.2450655?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:acbsfi:v:35:y:2025:i:1:p:67-99. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/RABF21 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.