IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/acbsfi/v31y2021i3p315-334.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Gender stereotyping in public accounting: Price Waterhouse v. Hopkins

Author

Listed:
  • Diane H. Roberts

Abstract

Ann Hopkins (1943–2018) was passed over for partner at Price Waterhouse (PW) in 1982 although she billed more hours than other aspiring partner candidates and obtained one of the largest deals in PW history to that date. Giving her the partnership denial news, a male PW partner cited her ‘macho’ demeanour and non-gender conforming behaviour as the reason. Hopkins sued in 1983 and finally prevailed in 1990 following the US Supreme Court holding in her favor. Hopkins lost seven years of her career before receiving her PW partnership by order of the court. Legal definitions of workplace discrimination were expanded to include gender stereotyping of men and women. Constructive discharge (legal condition necessary for a monetary remedy) was extended to career-ending circumstances including denial of partnership. Hopkins’s legal quest was situated in the gendered notions of her time and the gendered construction of the accounting profession. The study underscores her contributions to expanding opportunities for women in accounting and other professions.

Suggested Citation

  • Diane H. Roberts, 2021. "Gender stereotyping in public accounting: Price Waterhouse v. Hopkins," Accounting History Review, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 31(3), pages 315-334, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:acbsfi:v:31:y:2021:i:3:p:315-334
    DOI: 10.1080/21552851.2022.2057560
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/21552851.2022.2057560
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/21552851.2022.2057560?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:acbsfi:v:31:y:2021:i:3:p:315-334. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/RABF21 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.