IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/acbsfi/v30y2020i3p291-305.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

W. W. Werntz and the curious case of ASR No. 78 (1957): insights and lessons for historians

Author

Listed:
  • Dale L. Flesher
  • Gary John Previts
  • Tonya Kay Flesher

Abstract

The Securities and Exchange Commission censured its former Chief Accountant, William W. Werntz, in a case involving his first audit after leaving the SEC. This study investigates the oddities and mysteries surrounding this case and the conclusions reveal lessons for accounting historians. One conclusion is that the establishment of accounting and auditing standards is conducted in a political environment. Further, individuals who work in this environment have complicated and, sometimes, adversarial past associations and some promote ideas out of positions of self-interest, personal animosities, or for the sake of appearances. Thus accounting historians are warned to be aware of the political and social facets that underlie events and actions when trying to discover the theory behind the rules and to also suspect that the position taken may not have been for ideological reasons. As with this episode, some mysteries may not be resolved because vital facts are not available and thus the most important warning is to gather facts while the witnesses are available to provide information.

Suggested Citation

  • Dale L. Flesher & Gary John Previts & Tonya Kay Flesher, 2020. "W. W. Werntz and the curious case of ASR No. 78 (1957): insights and lessons for historians," Accounting History Review, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 30(3), pages 291-305, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:taf:acbsfi:v:30:y:2020:i:3:p:291-305
    DOI: 10.1080/21552851.2020.1774398
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/21552851.2020.1774398
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/21552851.2020.1774398?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:acbsfi:v:30:y:2020:i:3:p:291-305. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/RABF21 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.