IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/acbsfi/v30y2020i3p263-289.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

From ‘pure Satisfaction and Curiosity’ to the ‘particular gain or loss upon each article’: early modern philosophies of accounting in English accounting textbooks

Author

Listed:
  • Pierre Gervais

Abstract

Beginning with a periodisation of a set of 45 textbooks published in English between 1547 and 1799, and analysed by J. R. Edwards, Graeme Dean, and Frank Clarke in 2009, the study shows that in this sample, a significant shift took place in the use of managerial references between the seventeenth and the eighteenth century. Moreover, within the second period, the qualitative analysis of a sub-sample of five of these textbooks indicates that these references appeared within different epistemological contexts, not all of them business-related. Early in the 1700s, accounting techniques were presented at first as tools of self-discovery and temperance. Textbooks from the mid-eighteenth century increasingly referred to the pursuit of scientific knowledge, maybe under the influence of the Enlightenment, while late-eighteenth-century authors started to develop a business-oriented epistemology.

Suggested Citation

  • Pierre Gervais, 2020. "From ‘pure Satisfaction and Curiosity’ to the ‘particular gain or loss upon each article’: early modern philosophies of accounting in English accounting textbooks," Accounting History Review, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 30(3), pages 263-289, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:acbsfi:v:30:y:2020:i:3:p:263-289
    DOI: 10.1080/21552851.2020.1813598
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/21552851.2020.1813598
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/21552851.2020.1813598?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:acbsfi:v:30:y:2020:i:3:p:263-289. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/RABF21 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.