IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/acbsfi/v29y2019i2p171-198.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Locating moral boundaries in the early accountancy profession

Author

Listed:
  • Stephen P. Walker

Abstract

Studies of the accounting profession increasingly suggest the alterability of ethical and moral boundaries over time and space. This study explores moral delineation in the British accountancy profession at a key juncture during its institutionalisation. The results of a micro-level investigation of the case of David Chadwick are presented. Chadwick, a major contributor to the organisation of the profession and a Member of Parliament, was found guilty of bribery in 1881, shortly after the formation of the Institute of Chartered Accountants in England and Wales. Highly publicised revelations of his misconduct appear, however, to have been received with indifference by the accountancy bodies to which he belonged. The study explores a number of possible explanations for this apparent disinterest at a time when the conduct of accounting professionals was under close scrutiny. It is suggested that in late Victorian Britain, bribery, though a criminal act, was seldom perceived as immoral and was therefore located outside the moral boundaries of the accounting profession.

Suggested Citation

  • Stephen P. Walker, 2019. "Locating moral boundaries in the early accountancy profession," Accounting History Review, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 29(2), pages 171-198, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:acbsfi:v:29:y:2019:i:2:p:171-198
    DOI: 10.1080/21552851.2019.1607166
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/21552851.2019.1607166
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/21552851.2019.1607166?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:acbsfi:v:29:y:2019:i:2:p:171-198. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/RABF21 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.