IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/acbsfi/v23y2013i1p85-105.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The search for unity in the French accountancy profession, 1969--1996

Author

Listed:
  • S. El Omari
  • J.-L. Rossignol
  • M. Saboly

Abstract

The French accountancy profession is represented by two principal professional organisations, one comprising experts-comptables , or chartered accountants, and the other commissaires aux comptes , or auditors. Following the organisation of the audit profession in 1969, attempts have been made to form a single accountancy profession. The paper analyses the unsuccessful attempts to achieve unification from the 1970s to the 1990s. It is shown that the motivation for unification mutated over the focal period. Changing organisational elites played significant roles in furthering and hindering attempts at merger. The intervention of the state was a source of confusion and added complexity to professional discourses. The existence of unions ( syndicats ) and associations within the professional organisations is revealed as a peculiar and significant feature of professional configurations in France. The increasing presence of large international firms in France also impacted on the debate. Despite increased cooperation between the two professional groups, unification was not achieved. Divergent visions of the professional model, personal differences between organisational actors and the fragmentation of interests within the two professions ensured the preservation of organisational separatism.

Suggested Citation

  • S. El Omari & J.-L. Rossignol & M. Saboly, 2013. "The search for unity in the French accountancy profession, 1969--1996," Accounting History Review, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 23(1), pages 85-105, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:acbsfi:v:23:y:2013:i:1:p:85-105
    DOI: 10.1080/21552851.2013.773637
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/21552851.2013.773637
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/21552851.2013.773637?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:acbsfi:v:23:y:2013:i:1:p:85-105. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/RABF21 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.